Amarissa Kiara Toth vs Lara Schmidt Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 May at 11:10 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Kiara Toth vs L. Schmidt

HUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Toth 1 - 0 Schmidt
They have played 2 sets in total, with Amarissa Kiara Toth winning 2 and Lara Schmidt winning 0. The last match between Amarissa Kiara Toth and Lara Schmidt was at the W50 Otocec, 27-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Amarissa Kiara Toth getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Toth | 1 |
| Schmidt | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W50 Otocec(05-27-25)
A. K. Toth vs L. Schmidt H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $5,922 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 66.04% (175-90) | Career Total W/L | 51.72% (120-112) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. K. Toth vs L. Schmidt Match Preview:
- Second Serve Points: Toth recently secured 39.21% of points on their second serve, outperforming Schmidt's 31.72%. Could this indicate a competitive edge for Toth? Quite possibly, as second serve performance often correlates with match outcomes.
- Return Game Efficiency: Schmidt holds a slight advantage, winning 53.95% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Toth's 52.01%. On first serves, Schmidt also edges out Toth, with percentages of 40.7% and 39.97%, respectively. Does this suggest better returning skills for Schmidt? Potentially, yet both players have close numbers.
- Pressure Handling: Under pressure, Toth has saved 43.51% of breakpoints, marginally better than Schmidt's 40%. Could this be crucial during pivotal moments in the match? It stands to reason, especially for in-game strategy.
- Overall Match Performance: Over the past year, Toth has a higher match win rate at 68.06% compared to Schmidt's 57.14%. Does this give Toth a statistical advantage? It indeed paints a favorable picture for Toth.
- Surface Specialization: Toth excels on Clay with a 68% win rate, whereas Schmidt shines on Hard courts with 62%. Given the surface, could this platform offer one player an edge?
- Player Level Match Experience: At the Challenger/ITF level, Toth wins 67.24% of their matches, outpacing Schmidt's 57.69%. How might this different skill level experience factor in? It's an edge that might favor Toth.
- Opponent Quality: Toth's average opponent rank is higher at 390.31, compared to Schmidt's 419.17. Does this level of competition imply greater experience for Toth? Likely, as playing against stronger opponents can refine skills.
- Deciding Set Performance: Both players have an identical deciding set win rate of 44% over the past year. Could this result in an unpredictable final set? Quite possibly so.
- Break Point Conversion: Schmidt has a higher conversion rate at 50.7%, compared to Toth's 41.07%. Is this indicative of Schmidt's ability to capitalize on crucial points? Indeed, it could be decisive in break point scenarios.
Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):
In assessing the upcoming tennis match, we find Toth's second serve success and higher overall match wins noteworthy. Notably, Toth's greater experience against higher-ranked opponents showcases a potentially critical competitive edge.
While Schmidt demonstrates proficiency in return games and breakpoint conversion, Toth's ability to handle pressure, especially on their favored Clay surface, positions them advantageously. Despite Schmidt's strengths, the surface and current metrics suggest a slight lean towards Toth.
In conclusion, given the various performance metrics and context, Toth emerges with a favorable position and is the likely winner of this impending encounter.
Amarissa Kiara Toth vs Lara Schmidt Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. K. Toth vs L. Schmidt H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:22:7 | Average Match Time | 1:22:7 |
| 73% (30/41) | 1st Serve % | 68% (30/44) |
| 67% (20/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 73% (8/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 21% (3/14) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 61% (27/44) | Return Points Win % | 32% (13/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. K. Toth Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 | L | w/o | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 7-6(3) 6-0 | ||
R2 | W | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
L. Schmidt Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-6(0) 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 ret. | ||

A. K. Toth vs L. Schmidt Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.04% (175/90) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.72% (120/112) |
| 64.16% (376/210) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.54% (269/243) |
| 56.94% (2906/2198) | Games Win/Loss | 51.78% (2352/2190) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.90% (39/24) |
| 67.66% (159/76) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.99% (63/74) |
| 56.52% (13/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56.25% (18/14) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 79 | Aces Total | 50 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 680 | Total Double Faults | 569 |
| 1:29:58 | Average Match Time | 1:26:23 |
| 450.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 505.17 |
| 70% (10808/15365) | 1st Serve % | 71% (8581/12077) |
| 57% (6170/10808) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (4776/8581) |
| 46% (2088/4557) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (1477/3496) |
| 54% (1269/2358) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (861/1734) |
| 52% (8030/15516) | Return Points Win % | 49% (5932/12159) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 61.78% (97/60) | Challenger W/L | 47.46% (56/62) |
| 75.51% (74/24) | Futures W/L | 57.14% (64/48) |
| 67% (167/249) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (115/218) |
| 29% (2/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 61% (20/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 30% (9/30) |
| 56% (33/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (25/55) |
| 87% (176/153) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (125/103) |
| 13% (176/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (125/21) |
| 26% (88/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (107/17) |